"Heave-ho" To Heavy Lifting
October 1998
|
Material handling safety is a matter of taking calculated manual lifting risks, enlisting the help of an array of safety equipment—or simply losing productivity.
by Susan Friedman
Sure, press downtime is a major thorn in productivity's side, but how far will any print job progress if key workers are absent—home nursing back injuries caused by heavy lifting?
Material handling safety's effect on operation efficiencies and profits could be comparable to the impact of digital prepress or streamlined makeready. A plethora of medical and insurance data shows why.
According to the Ergonomics Assist Systems Equipment (E.A.S.E.) Council of Material Handling Industry, back disorders are most costly in terms of workers' compensation and lost time. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) estimates manual materials handling injuries represent 35 percent of workers' compensation claims. Medical expenses, lost wages, lower productivity and other expenses from these injuries amount to $116 billion annually.
In 1996, BLS reported more than 490,000 occupational back injuries involving days away from work, with a median of six workdays missed. Printing press operators racked up 1,524 back injuries that caused lost time, while the printing and publishing industry as a whole recorded back injuries requiring time off for 44.6 full-time workers per every 10,000.
A heightened watchdog mentality adds to the immediacy of material handling issues. E.A.S.E. warns that OSHA has recently cited ergonomic violations as "willful," under the Workplace Safety Act.
Employers must be taking these statistics seriously, because according to Barbara Webster, a researcher at Liberty Mutual Research Center for Safety and Health, the frequency of material handling injuries has stabilized in recent years. Several soon-to-be released studies actually show a decline in claims for back injuries, she notes. One contributor to this trend could be Early-Return-to-Work programs, which aim to curtail the average duration of disability.
If a worker decides to, or has no choice but to manually lift a heavy object, Webster offers the following injury-prevention pointers:
•Keep the object close to the body; try to avoid a long reach.
•Avoid bending, twisting or jerking motions when lifting.
•Maintain overall physical fitness to boost resiliency to back injuries.
•Implement packaging that makes the 'to-lift-or-not-to-lift' decision more clear-cut. Packaged items should be light enough for anyone to lift easily, or heavy enough to automatically warrant the use of material handling equipment.
Lightening the load
For printers and converters looking to implement or improve material handling ergonomics, suppliers offer a number of unique means to cushion the stress of lifting or transporting.
by Susan Friedman
Sure, press downtime is a major thorn in productivity's side, but how far will any print job progress if key workers are absent—home nursing back injuries caused by heavy lifting?
Material handling safety's effect on operation efficiencies and profits could be comparable to the impact of digital prepress or streamlined makeready. A plethora of medical and insurance data shows why.
According to the Ergonomics Assist Systems Equipment (E.A.S.E.) Council of Material Handling Industry, back disorders are most costly in terms of workers' compensation and lost time. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) estimates manual materials handling injuries represent 35 percent of workers' compensation claims. Medical expenses, lost wages, lower productivity and other expenses from these injuries amount to $116 billion annually.
In 1996, BLS reported more than 490,000 occupational back injuries involving days away from work, with a median of six workdays missed. Printing press operators racked up 1,524 back injuries that caused lost time, while the printing and publishing industry as a whole recorded back injuries requiring time off for 44.6 full-time workers per every 10,000.
A heightened watchdog mentality adds to the immediacy of material handling issues. E.A.S.E. warns that OSHA has recently cited ergonomic violations as "willful," under the Workplace Safety Act.
Employers must be taking these statistics seriously, because according to Barbara Webster, a researcher at Liberty Mutual Research Center for Safety and Health, the frequency of material handling injuries has stabilized in recent years. Several soon-to-be released studies actually show a decline in claims for back injuries, she notes. One contributor to this trend could be Early-Return-to-Work programs, which aim to curtail the average duration of disability.
If a worker decides to, or has no choice but to manually lift a heavy object, Webster offers the following injury-prevention pointers:
•Keep the object close to the body; try to avoid a long reach.
•Avoid bending, twisting or jerking motions when lifting.
•Maintain overall physical fitness to boost resiliency to back injuries.
•Implement packaging that makes the 'to-lift-or-not-to-lift' decision more clear-cut. Packaged items should be light enough for anyone to lift easily, or heavy enough to automatically warrant the use of material handling equipment.
Lightening the load
For printers and converters looking to implement or improve material handling ergonomics, suppliers offer a number of unique means to cushion the stress of lifting or transporting.
Companies Mentioned:
 |
|
|
Best Practices for Print Automation
Competing for Print’s Thriving Future