The Right Tools for the Job
Automated workflows are beginning to address the many special requirements for package printing.
August 2008 by Jean-Marie Hershey
|
What will I look like? How will I perform? If a package could ask questions, these might be among the first and most important it would pose. The answers are less elusive than they used to be, thanks to the development of automated workflows that understand the complex nature of packaging work.
However, for mixed commercial and packaging printers wanting to increase the amount of repeat packaging work they take on, or for pure commercial printers wanting to tap the potentially lucrative packaging market, it is important to grasp that their familiar thinking in pages and jobs no longer applies and also that the economic stakes have changed. Consequently, packaging-minded commercial printers will need to invest in workflow software that understands packaging requirements, produces a cost-effective structure, resolves problems quickly and easily, and facilitates production.
Packaging’s customized nature
It’s no exaggeration to state that every packaging project is unique. For one thing, “Packaging doesn’t follow a standard formatted page size,” says Tyler Harrell, innovations and solutions manager, EskoArtwork. “It isn’t something for which you typically can find an automated solution because there are so many new packages created every day. Packaging also requires a certain degree of prepress expertise because every job is an exception.”
Automated workflows that are designed to handle the special needs of packaging are distinguished by the ways in which they rise to specific challenges foreign to commercial workflows. Structural design and sheet layout, for example, introduce a number of new elements to the workflow equation—from making sure the graphic elements fit properly to the overall composition of a production run. The structural engineer is trying to make sure the package can be manufactured on a production line, while the graphic designer is looking to create the most visually compelling story possible.
The need to unite structural and graphic design presents some of the thorniest of preproduction problems. “Sometimes there is good correlation between structural and graphic design, but one can also be well out in front of the other, in which case multiple revisions have to be made to accommodate and combine them in the same package,” says Harrell.
EskoArtwork’s Studio software is an Illustrator plug-in that imports CAD drawings directly into Illustrator and displays them in 3D, where the user can rotate, flip, or fold the flat piece. This helps avoid having to go to a physical prototype, in favor of being able to review the file in a virtual form to determine compatibility. After the actual design is finalized, however, the issue becomes how to nest two, eight, 10, 12, or 14 of those structures as efficiently as possible for the production run to save run lengths and material. Another EskoArtwork tool, Smart Layout, automatically evaluates all the possible iterations of that job based on the sheet size and determines how many of each will fit on a given sheet.
However, for mixed commercial and packaging printers wanting to increase the amount of repeat packaging work they take on, or for pure commercial printers wanting to tap the potentially lucrative packaging market, it is important to grasp that their familiar thinking in pages and jobs no longer applies and also that the economic stakes have changed. Consequently, packaging-minded commercial printers will need to invest in workflow software that understands packaging requirements, produces a cost-effective structure, resolves problems quickly and easily, and facilitates production.
Packaging’s customized nature
It’s no exaggeration to state that every packaging project is unique. For one thing, “Packaging doesn’t follow a standard formatted page size,” says Tyler Harrell, innovations and solutions manager, EskoArtwork. “It isn’t something for which you typically can find an automated solution because there are so many new packages created every day. Packaging also requires a certain degree of prepress expertise because every job is an exception.”
Automated workflows that are designed to handle the special needs of packaging are distinguished by the ways in which they rise to specific challenges foreign to commercial workflows. Structural design and sheet layout, for example, introduce a number of new elements to the workflow equation—from making sure the graphic elements fit properly to the overall composition of a production run. The structural engineer is trying to make sure the package can be manufactured on a production line, while the graphic designer is looking to create the most visually compelling story possible.
The need to unite structural and graphic design presents some of the thorniest of preproduction problems. “Sometimes there is good correlation between structural and graphic design, but one can also be well out in front of the other, in which case multiple revisions have to be made to accommodate and combine them in the same package,” says Harrell.
EskoArtwork’s Studio software is an Illustrator plug-in that imports CAD drawings directly into Illustrator and displays them in 3D, where the user can rotate, flip, or fold the flat piece. This helps avoid having to go to a physical prototype, in favor of being able to review the file in a virtual form to determine compatibility. After the actual design is finalized, however, the issue becomes how to nest two, eight, 10, 12, or 14 of those structures as efficiently as possible for the production run to save run lengths and material. Another EskoArtwork tool, Smart Layout, automatically evaluates all the possible iterations of that job based on the sheet size and determines how many of each will fit on a given sheet.
Companies Mentioned:
 |
|
|
Print Production Workflow: A Practical Guide
The Ultimate Guide to Multi-Channel Communications Solutions
